![]() ![]() We think that they encrypted the data, we trust them they did patch the systems, we expect them to hire more competent developers, admins, etc and invest into new security hardware, etc, but that does not make it true. Security by obscurity would be a bank using an less known key standard to open lock on the door and not to weight what chance is there for a some bank robber to get to my safe deposit box depending on how many attacks on the bank door there are and what is the total value of the bank vault.Īnd don't forget, YOU and ME, we don't have a view of what goes behind that close doors. which is where most of the breaches have been are unencrypted by default.ĭon't understand the point of your reply - was it ment to negate what I wrote or was it ment to agree with my point, was it ment to educate me or what?īut weighting security uppon how much is the system desired by the hackers is not security by obscurity. ![]() Also most of the storage big shots store everything encrypted, versus idiots using blob storage from amazon, etc. ![]() It's easy to find targets on the internet. ![]() How often do we argue here that security by obscurity is not security at all. Is it safer to use big company with lots of hacking on their doors or is it safer to use something like NextCloud on premise for some specific company? i have an strange feeling for the last 2 years with all breaches that there will be a massive data leak from one of the giants and maybe it would be better fore some to stay oway from them. Those are large data-stores and are a big red dot for hackers to play with their security. all managed by enormous companies who spend more on security than most of our companies spend on everything.īut here is something to think about. It is no more or less safe than anything else. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |